![]() |
||
INSIDE THIS ISSUE
|
From the President Dear Minister Witmer It’s time to
bell the ministry cat Congratulations on your
appointment as minister of education. OQE looks forward to continuing to work
with you and your ministry to improve learning results for all Ontario
students. We are glad to hear that
you and Premier Eves will be taking a less confrontational stance on education
issues. OQE has agreed with much, but certainly not all, of what has been done
by the Conservative government over the past seven years. Often, we have
cringed at the ham-fisted and sometimes mean-spirited ways in which new
programs have been announced and implemented. Improving the tone is important —
but it is not enough. There are real problems persisting in the system. For one, public
dissatisfaction with the way that incompetent teachers are being dealt with
remains very high. A recent poll by the Ontario Principals’ Association showed
that a whopping 83% of Ontarians support your government’s well-intentioned
(but unfortunately named) “teacher testing” program. While encouraging you to
keep moving on initiatives aimed at addressing this public concern, we ask that
you shift your primary focus from mandatory professional development to using
performance appraisals as the primary vehicle for identification and corrective
action relative to teaching incompetence. A more pressing problem,
however, is the stagnation of student learning. Despite a better elementary
curriculum and the implementation of report cards that teachers and parents can
understand, the province-wide EQAO tests continue to indicate that Ontario
students are not learning as much as they should, especially with respect to
reading and writing skills. OQE feels that the chief
cause of this stagnation is the unwillingness to take a ‘clean sheet’ approach
to reviewing the root causes of poor learning. While the amount of time parents
spend reading with their children gets a lot of attention, the impact of
classroom teaching methods is seldom analyzed. This blinkered approach to
looking at test scores is a result of your government’s push for more accountability
not having gone far enough. We have cheered as your
government made available information about where school boards spend their
money. The easy-to-follow data on your ministry website invite best-practices
comparisons — comparisons that show, for example, that the Toronto public board, undoubtedly the most vocal critic of the new funding formula,
spends twice as much
of its operating (continued...) | |