Who will bell the cat?
Although everybody knows that good teachers matter, most educational administrators profess helplessness when it comes to identifying who they are. The Blob (a newly-coined name for the thousands of institutions, boards, companies, federations, alliances, departments, faculties, councils, commissions, panels, offices, and colleges that control public education) resists the use of test scores to separate the sheep from the goats, and somehow they just can’t seem to come up with any other way to identify good teachers.
It shouldn’t be this hard! After all, private enterprises (including private schools) routinely identify and reward good employees.
Be that as it may, here’s a modest proposal, recently published in the New York Times, for an objective way to assess teacher performance. The author cites research showing that the amount of time teachers spend delivering relevant instruction is strongly correlated with how much students learn, and suggests that we evaluate teachers on the basis of how much relevant instruction they deliver.
But how can we find out how much time teachers are spending on relevant instruction you ask. The author proposes that administrators simply videotape a few minutes of instruction a day and evaluate the results.
Surely the Blob could have no possible objection to this notion!




“A focus on relevant instructional time also implies several further reforms: Lengthening the school day, week and year; adopting a near-zero-tolerance policy for disruptive behavior, which classroom cameras would help police; increasing efforts to reduce tardiness and absenteeism; and providing as much supplementary and remedial tutoring (the most effective instructional model known) as possible.
Nor are these particularly difficult policies to put in place. Many schools around the country, particularly charters, already use some or all of them.”
There is cameras already in my child’s classrooms, zero tolerance for bad behaviour of any kind, and providing tutoring. Plus teachers are available for students after school anytime, to asked any questions about the subject material. It shows in over-all achievement and kids wanting to go to school. Too early to see the long-term effects, but the changes made certainly help my child. The other day, there was a full tutor class for grade 10 academic math, that lasted for 1 hour and 1/2, Many of the students that attended were already doing well, which indicates a real interest in math. Further proof, next year’s grade 11 advance math, there will be 33 students enrolled in it. First time in the history of the school, where normally 3 to 5 students enrolled in the advance math class.
I would state that the teachers at my child’s high school, are effective teachers, as well as being qualified to teach the subjects. In other words, a English teacher is not teaching math or science, or a math teacher is not teaching English.