Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Through a glass darkly

May 23, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:38 AM

In a comment to yesterday’s blog, fromEurope drew our attention to a very interesting discussion over at Kitchen Table Math. The topic is the widespread dominance of “fuzzy math” even in charter and private schools. This is unfortunately all too true and, of course, the phenomenon extends to subject areas other than math.

Sadly, charter schools and private schools are being dragged down by the same handicaps as conventional public schools. Most of their teachers have been trained at the same woefully-inadequate faculties of education. They draw from the same pool of dreadful textbooks and other teaching materials. They are constrained by many of the same cloying provincial or state policies and regulations. And, inevitably, they are influenced by the same erroneous philosophy and a culture of low expectations. 

Worst of all, charter and private schools have little incentive to do much better than conventional public schools, since the conventional schools practically hand deliver students to them. Private and charter schools are in competition with a very weak competitor, and all they have to do is offer a service that is just a little bit better than lousy. And, for the most part, that is what they do offer.

Comments

This post can go in yesterday’s topic, as well as in today’s topic. Today, I ran into SEDL pushing a few things regarding math, and encouraging parent involvement.

Organizations, more or less run by educators in boards, or state-run, play the role of ensuring that curriculum of major text book publishers are being used. SEDL is all for Everyday Mathematics.

“Researchers at SEDL and the University of Wisconsin-Madison are conducting a study of Imagine It!, an Open Court Reading program, and Everyday Mathematics to determine the impact of the programs on teacher practices and student academic achievement.”
http://research.sedl.org/ocr-em/

Nice reward package, if schools sign up to be part of the study.

“Why should schools participate?
•Each participating school will receive FREE Imagine It! or Everyday Mathematics materials approximating $3,200 per classroom.
•Participating schools will also receive FREE training and support for the duration of the study!
•Participating schools are taking action that may increase their overall performance on state-mandated reading and math assessments and the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
•Participating schools will be integral to a national study with the potential to shape reading and math research and education policy.”

For more of the same fuzzy math no doubt, and one can look forward to new excuses why children are not achieving in math.

On the site there is links to Everyday Mathematics.
Below is the home page.
http://everydaymath.uchicago.edu/educators/computation/

A series of videos, and check out the addition. I do not need to have a PHD in math, to figure it out that this is no method to teach place value. Talk about putting a relatively simple concept, and make it as confusing and complicated to understand for students and parents alike to grasp and sort the illogical approaches that are used in place value, and expect students to perform in testing.

And now SEDL is involve with families and communities, and being insiders have now become a place to go to, for information on parental involvement.
http://www.sedl.org/expertise/family_community.html

One of the recommendations is to give parent explicit directions on how to help their children at home. It it tied in with Everyday Mathematics, to ensure that parents learn the new fuzzy math. I can only imagine the wars being played out in homes, and parents reaching for the phone to dial a tutor, feeling that their abilities in addressing basic arithmetic are lacking.

Just one more area, that charter or public schools are weighted down by handicaps, as well as parents are.

Posted by Nancy on 05/23 at 10:45 AM

Interesting over at G&M this morning, where Kate Hammer, the education reporter, laments the fact that Toronto schools are slow to adopt JUMP math. She calls the program “revolutionary”—except there is nothing revolutionary about effective direct systematic teaching.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/toronto-public-schools-slow-to-adopt-jump-math-program/article2032298/

Posted by Doretta on 05/24 at 06:42 AM

Yes, charter and private schools are being dragged down by the same handicaps as conventional public schools.
That’s one of the reasons the ideea is so easily attacked and dismantled. If one imposes the same stupid curriculum and the use of Canadian certified teachers the results are going to be a bit better but not enough to prove anything.

To have any sort of competition results have to matter. Since there aren’t any sort of exit or entrance exams in the Ontario public system, results do not matter.
Other than a few elite university programs that either have extremely high admission cutoffs or use additional criteria besides the high school marks, one is pretty much guaranteed access into a university program if the marks are in the mid eighties. Whether these mid eighties marks guarantee knowledge or not nobody has the courage to question or to test.

So from what I hear there are some interesting trends happening.
Parents that actually prefer their kids attend a not so demanding high school so that they have a chance to stand out and get higher grades.
Parents that send their kids to private high schools for the first few years so that he or she gets used to study and has some foundations and then switch to public high schools in last year or the last two years for a jump in grades.
Parents that do not consider specialized programs even when their child may have some inclination towards that area of study because all the students may be good and the expectations higher.

If all that matters are grades that cannot be tested, there is a race to get grades that look good in order to get in and not necessarily to learn what you will need later on to be successful in university.

There will be little competition even if more school alternatives are available unless there is unfudgeable testing of the quality of learning.

See, some high schools post on their sites as a positive the percentage of students that get into secondary education. Yeah, not bad.

I have not seen yet any statistic, based on how many of the former students of that high school actually graduate or at least make it into year two of the secondary education program they have chosen.
Or along the same line, what percentage of graduates of a secondary education program get jobs in their field within a year?

Posted by fromEurope on 05/26 at 08:06 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: