Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

The Case of the Disappearing Money

August 17, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 05:16 PM

Life just got easier for the many parents whose schools have given them a very specific - and long - list of must-have supplies for back-to-school - six packs of glue sticks, three highlighters (blue, yellow and green), grey Duo-Tangs, baby wipes, Post-It notes, two large pencil cases, and on and on…. This article in today’s Globe and Mail profiles a new shopping service for busy parents (more information at toolsforschools.ca).

The reporter apparently sees nothing odd in expecting parents to devote significant amounts of time and/or money to the schools’ shopping lists, citing “ongoing classroom cuts” and “budget cutbacks”. Yet, as Sunshine on Schools clearly shows, Ontario is spending more than ever on education. In 2003, the Ontario government spent about $16.25 billion on its schools, while in 2009, it spent about $20.75 billion - and increase of roughly $4.5 billion in six years. Where has all this money gone?

At least part of the answer may be suggested by a new study from the Goldwater Institute: Administrative Bloat at American Universities: The real reason for high costs in higher education. The researchers found that leading American universities are increasing their spending on administration more than twice as quickly than they are increasing their spending on instruction, research, and service. 

Bureaucracies like to grow, and they’re very good at it. There’s little point giving school boards more money when it doesn’t reach the classroom.

Comments

What has always concerned me is what do the children whose parents can’t afford this financial output for school supplies do? 
From school, we used to get our list, and within a week it seemed that a lot of the supplies had been lost.  One mother and I concluded that somewhere there must be a vast wearhouse bursting at the seems with children’s lost school supplies!

Posted by Bev on 08/17 at 07:12 PM

“Bureaucracies like to grow, and they’re very good at it. “

And no one had grown the educational bureaucracy like McGuinty has. 

Where has all of the money gone is right! Perhaps we need to post a Lost and Found bulletin on behalf of Ontario taxpayers?

We know that some of that money went to those Ontario sponsorship type signs that every school has on an outer wall somewhere. At $200+ ea. for every school in the province??  Also, let’s not forget that money went also for each school to have a illuminated signed grounded at the front of their schools - payed for with the taxpayer dollars….or bribe money that the government paid parents for their “engagement” and has every year without proof that it’s actually contributing to better educated children.

Posted by Chuck on 08/18 at 08:39 AM

Bev,

I don’t know about every school/classroom in the province, but I did learn something interesting last year.  My youngest started JK and we were filling her list along with the other two children.  Her list was as long as the others.  I wondered about why someone so young would need six glue sticks in one year, when she only goes every other day.

This teacher was quite up front by telling us that the students don’t have their ‘own’ supplies.  The supplies we buy go into bins for the whole class to use.  Although not said, I would assume that needy students who cannot contribute are thereby not embarrassed.

However, it does bring into question the validity of the whole process.  I remember (back in the dim mists of time ... grin ) part of the fun of the first day of school was getting the books and supplies from the teacher.  We would speculate about what the notebooks would look like, colours, etc.  It does seem interesting that even though we are spending ever more on education, we are receiving less in return.

Even though students of more well off families didn’t need the free supplies from the school - it did become the great equalizer.  Like uniforms, if students all have the same supplies, then the competition for having something better/more fashionable is gone.  Parents constantly have to buy new binders, running shoes, etc. that are ‘lost’ every year by their kids. 

I can tell you, that most of those ‘lost’ items end up shoved in the back of a locker, or even dumped in the garbage simply because they aren’t as neat and cool as the others.  Perhaps, like some many of you have noted on other topics on this blog, this was something that we did better 40 years ago than we do now.

Posted by Wayne Scott Ng on 08/18 at 09:58 AM

Perhaps we should put together a back to school kit of our own that would truly reflect what both student and parent can expect from the school year.  Include a voucher for tutors, a list of definitions of “eduspeak” and a family-size bottle of Tylenol.

Posted by Chuck on 08/18 at 12:46 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: