Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Praise for a Teachers’ Union

February 08, 2010 by at 08:43 AM

American Educator, the magazine of the American Federation of Teachers, is always good value, but in its latest edition the AFT has outdone itself. The feature article by E. D. Hirsch, Jr. on the importance of a core curriculum is fascinating and eye-opening. “Ask the Cognitive Scientist” by Dan Willingham explains that virtually everyone can become good at math, and then shows how. “Want to Improve Children’s Writing” by Steve Graham outlines how teaching handwriting will actually improve students’ ability to focus and organize ideas in their written work. As well, there are excellent articles on teacher training and recognition schemes. Lastly, don’t miss the Notebook link.

Comments

Unusual praise for a teachers’ union. This is the same Dan Willingham that explains why merit pay does not work on his website.

Posted by Doug Little on 02/08 at 12:16 PM

Dan Willingham says in one of his replies to his youtube video of this subject is quote, “I’m not necessarily against merit pay. I’m against using a measure that will not work the way people think it will.“ and yes I would have to agree. It would have to be more than just yearly marks.
You evaluate your students, so why can you not figure out how to evaluate your own members? Deadwood with tenure is still deadwood.

It also sounds to me like that union is asking for a common, core curriculum.

“With America’s strong interest in Singapore’s mathematics textbooks, these researchers caution against thinking that Singapore’s high achievement comes from its books alone. In particular, they explore the preparation and support of mathematics teachers who, unlike their counterparts in the United States, are guided by a coherent national curriculum; benefit from comprehensive preparation programs that emphasize subject-matter knowledge, pedagogy, and classroombased learning; and have several options to grow as educators. “

Sounds a lot like DI to me.

Posted by Mark H. on 02/09 at 11:05 AM

Yes Willingham has one of the best explanations of why so called value added merit pay does not work.

It does not sound like DI to me, instead it sounds like common sense. I have no objection to a common core curriculum, in fact I am all for it. It was one of the only things that Bob Rae’s government did right.

Posted by Doug Little on 02/09 at 12:01 PM

Common Sense Doug? I knew it! A closet Mike Harris conservative to the core! Busted!

Posted by Chuck on 02/09 at 02:34 PM

You need to be aware that “a common curriculum” was a demand of the unions, not the teachers’ unions, the other ones, and was implimented by Bob Rae and David Cooke. A common core curriculum is a recurring demand of the left in education. Are you sure you still support it, LOL.

Posted by Doug Little on 02/09 at 03:49 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Next entry: Media Heads Up

Previous entry: Crazy Like a Fox