Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Not-so-special Education

May 18, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 06:04 AM

This week, Educhatter writes about “The New Byzantium” - the maze of intricately-involved, elaborate systems that “serve” children with special needs. Replete with cryptic acronyms, obscure regulations, pseudo-scientific terminology, and a massive administrative staff, Special Education is - despite the lack of popular demand - growing by leaps and bounds. In Nova Scotia, for example, the number of special education students has grown by 3%-4% per year since 2001, even while overall student enrollment has declined by 2%-3% per year. The best advice available to parents is to “build a positive relationship with the school ... to win special attention for your child”. 

And it’s not just in Nova Scotia. Because children with special needs face exactly the same situation in Ontario (including extremely long waits for testing and treatment), a while back the Fraser Institute made a modest proposal to Let the Funding Follow the Children. In this scenario, the government gives about three-quarters of the funding it would normally spend on the child if he or she attended a public school to the parents and allows them to spend the money at a private school instead. This already happens in three Canadian provinces and several American states, with excellent results. Not only are the children better off, but also the government actually saves money. And even the kids whose parents don’t choose this option are better off - as the number of public school students jostling for special services declines.

Comments

More tax dollars completely wasted with very little or zero bang for our bucks.  Government spending is out of control, and it seems to be getting worse all the time.  Spending on education is no exception.

Posted by Bev on 05/18 at 02:32 PM

Special Education reform is an arduous, if not impossible, challenge in the face of the entrenched interests in the field. That is why your latest post is such a valuable contribution to the Canadian policy debate:

Malkin’s proposal to “let funding follow the child” sounds like common sense.

The proposal is suppoerted by Nova Scotia’s Equal Education Assoication. In Nova Scotia, it exists for children with designated special needs and qualified to attend three different programs, Bridgeway Academy, Churchill Academy, and Landmark East School.

Letting funding follow the child advances school choice for parents of special needs kids. It sure beats begging for “accomodations” and “adaptations” in the New Byzantium of special education law.

Posted by Educhatter on 05/19 at 06:44 AM

I agree 100 percent-

They do not intervene with proper instruction,accommodation =dumbing down which lets the students pass year to year but it isn`t real.There is nothing to sustain them once they leave the “system”.

Dr.Reid Lyon states that if we knew as much about Aids and Cancer as we know about learning disabilities through modern research findings,there would be a case for malpractice.

If you look at
http://www.wrightslaw.com/ you will see some of the interventions they stand by.
We need more-Canadians are asleep at the wheel.
Make a fuss,feel outrage.

Posted by Jo-Anne Gross on 05/19 at 06:56 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: