Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Maybe they need to read Outliers over again

August 11, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 09:18 AM

If Alberta schools are looking for a way to lose their first place in Canadian school achievement, maybe this is how they will do it.  This National Post article reports on a new program at an Airdrie, Alberta elementary school that would see grade two students picking their own major, essentially streaming young students into areas of their own interest.  According the the school’s principal, the goal of the program is to improve classroom engagement.  If they need to do this in grade two, they have a bigger problem.

Apparently someone read Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers and thinks that this is how you go about getting 10,000 hours of practice.  The problem is that the school has totally misunderstood the concept. 

Children will be surveyed in kindergarten and grade 1, and along with parental and teacher input, will be placed in their area of interest.  Frankly, from what I read in the Post article, this amounts to 10,000 hours of social indoctrination rather than making sure kids get 10,000 of reading and/or math practice. For instance:

       “For the humanitarian/environment stream, for example, Grade 3 teacher Carla Pierce plans to teach graphing from a humanitarian perspective by having students chart various countries’ wealth. A math class might involve an assignment in which children calculate waste accumulation, while a big-picture view will be provided by such guest speakers as the social-change organization Me to We.”

As you would expect, parents are not happy with the proposed changes.

For homework, I’m assigning the school administration the task of re-reading Gladwell’s Outliers chapter, Rice Paddies and Math Tests, about Asian students’ math achievement.  Success comes from hard work and 10,000 hours of practice, practice, practice in an extended school day, week, and year so that by middle school Asian students are ahead of their North American counterparts by at least a year.

Comments

Perhaps achievement is connected with encouraging creativity in our children. I just read an article, that should have its own posting on the very subject, creativity.

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/07/10/the-creativity-crisis.html

“Creativity has always been prized in American society, but it’s never really been understood. While our creativity scores decline unchecked, the current national strategy for creativity consists of little more than praying for a Greek muse to drop by our houses. The problems we face now, and in the future, simply demand that we do more than just hope for inspiration to strike. Fortunately, the science can help: we know the steps to lead that elusive muse right to our doors.”

Posted by Nancy on 08/11 at 05:52 PM

I read the article, and I think that educatros when trying to increase enrolment are missing the point:  parents want their children learning the basics.  In my opinion the lofty idea of the grade three teacher, to teach graphing, waste accumulation—do the children even understand math enough; understand what countries are (have they been taught any geography); waste accumulation?  It appears way over an eight-yr-old’s head.  They need to be memorizing their times tables; understanding fractions; basic geometry; measurement; learning to read; write; spell. 
I think these educators are in lala land; also, who devised these tests to determine where these children’s interest lie, and what were their qualifications to write and/or assess these same tests?  Thanks to the Macek report, we know that it’s not at all uncommon for unqualified people to curricula, in fields they know nothing about, therefore, it’s not a stretch to think that the same could easily be done in assessing interests of children.

Posted by Bev on 08/11 at 06:05 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: