Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Do the math

June 14, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 08:21 AM

Hypatia’s June 1 and June 12 blog entries are well worth reading, as they deal with the importance of the importance of strong subject knowledge for math teachers. You probably don’t have to be a rocket scientist to grasp that students learn more from teachers who are really good at math. This theme is well explored in Knowing and Teaching Mathematics by Liping Ma, a book available from our lending library.

Unfortunately, the education system doesn’t accord high priority to subject matter knowledge, as demonstrated by the number of high school teachers who are assigned to teach “out of field”, as well as the very high percentage of elementary teachers who avoided math in university. When the EQAO asked Ontario grade 3 teachers whether they felt comfortable teaching mathematics, between 29% and 54% indicated some discomfort (depending on the area of mathematics), and between 38% and 54% of grade 6 teachers reported the same. Only 9% of grade 6 math teachers had taken at least one university math course. These statistics are available here (pp. 21 and 39). 

It seems likely that Ontario kids would be doing better in math if fewer of their teachers were uncomfortable with the subject. Is this too much to ask?

Comments

I read further down, and I like this best of all

“Like it or not, arithmetic is the foundation of mathematics….Students must study arithmetic. The standard algorithms for whole numbers are the only really big theorems that students can be taught in elementary school. It is deep, beautiful, and powerful mathematics. Master these algorithms with understanding, and you’re ready to go.”

And meanwhile, they think standard algorithms are the opposite, boring old facts that cannot possibly lead to anything. I discovered that, while re-teaching my youngest, And now she is showing me how beautiful math can be. Pure and simple. And she still does not understand the fuzzy complicated math being taught. Thankfully she is in grade 10, where the fuzzy math is not as prevalent as it is in the elementary math.

Posted by Nancy on 06/14 at 10:07 AM

Malkin,

You state, “... Is this too much to ask?”  - absolutely not.  In fact, the parents of Ontario ought to be banging down the doors of their children’s schools demanding:  a) properly qualified teachers and b) (as Nancy has mentioned) an appropriate math curriculum.

I never cease to be amazed that I have to spend time in my math classes teaching kids:  15 - (-1) = 16.  It shows up in so many areas in the Grade 9 curriculum alone.  For example, if they can’t do that, how can you expect them to be able to do:  15x - (-x)?

Posted by Wayne Scott Ng on 06/14 at 10:28 AM

First discomfort is self-assesed.

On one hand since here in North America is culturally perfectly acceptable for anybody, including teachers, to say “I’m not good at math” probably the teachers did not minimize their evaluation of discomfort when answering, so in that respect the answers are relatively truthfull to their feelings.

On the other hand, how much would you trust somebody’s self assesment if the person has been growing up schooled in the “self-esteem” ethos and if that person - not being familiar with high performance standards - has no objective means to asses himself?

For elementary math teaching grade 1 to 4 I think that having the two serious grade 12 U math courses with over 85% should do. Or even better, make them past a tough high-school level math test.

I think for 5 to 8 you would need somebody with at least 2 university level math courses and ideally some science where math gets used.
Just so that person finds out from their own experience how extremely important it is to know the basic concepts correctly and fluently in order to be able to apply them and build on them!

Posted by fromEurope on 06/14 at 05:38 PM

You should be aware that prospective elementary teachers in Nova Scotia have had to have at least one undergraduate university course in mathematics in order to be licenced, and that requirement is about to be raised to two courses in mathematics.

Also in Nova Scotia, elementary education students must complete (at Mount Saint Vincent University at least) two separate mathematics curriculum and instruction courses (one in each year of their program) in order to graduate.

Posted by Robert Berard on 06/14 at 07:33 PM

Great! It seems that Nova Scotia is one step ahead of Ontario in that area.

What kind of math curriculum do you have in elementary school?
Is the use of textbooks encouraged or discouraged?
Is the use of calculators encouraged, allowed, discouraged?
Are the students taught and expected to know the standard algorithms of multiplication, long division?

Posted by fromEurope on 06/15 at 04:54 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: