Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Conflicted Trustees

August 21, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 10:43 AM

This Globe and Mail article reports that a judge has removed the Chair of the Toronto Catholic District School Board on conflict of interest grounds because her sons are substitute teachers for the board. There may also be a cloud over one of the other trustees whose daughter is an education assistant at the board.

The newspaper reports all this as if is a big story, but it is my impression that there are very few Ontario school boards without trustees with relatives or friends who work for their school boards. After all, it’s normal for educators to get interested in running for trustee when they disagree with board policy and figure it would make a nice part-time job after they retire from teaching. Or maybe they are encouraged to run for trustee by one of the teachers’ unions. Certainly, most school boards have former teachers among their trustees, along with educators who work or worked for other school boards.

All in all, I’m guessing there are precious few school boards in Ontario that are completely free of conflict of interest issues.

Comments

It would be interesting indeed to find out just how many trustees are former teachers/principals in this province.
Most board sites have bios. of trustees up somewhere.
Hmmm.

Taken one step further we see many trustees use their position as a stepping stone to municipal and provincial politics. Maybe that’s the problem in Ontario? Our gov’t is being run by former school board types?

Clearly boards just don’t guarantee any sense of local control or individualized input in to the operation of public schools.

What’s amazing to me is that this didn’t happen over recently but has been building up over the last decade.

We were warned that the decision-making models being championed by boards would lead to trustees being handy salespeople for gov’t programs developed in the Mowat block by those other former teachers and admin. who opted for the big lights and big salaries of bureaucracy.

Posted by Chuck on 08/22 at 08:45 AM

What a timely post on the whole issue of publicly-elected Trustees and accountability. The Toronto Catholic School Board seems to be giving all trustees a bad name. No wonder Trustee Davis is having trouble rounding up candidates.

I still wonder about the proposed alternative to elected boards.

Just finished researching the abolition of School Boards in New Brunswick. Premier Frank McKenna killed the boards in 1996 and did so by media release with no consultation and no warning.

Without school boards, New Brunswick is the most centralized school system by far in Canada. The School Councils are strictly advisory and ineffectual, as in other provinces. In 2001, DECs were established and they are “volunteers.” There is little or no accountability in NB at the local level.

Turf out the rascals, I say, and restore credibility to the existing system of local education democracy.

Sorry if I sound like a broken record. I’m definitely of that vintage!

Posted by Educhatter on 08/22 at 02:40 PM

Paul - I’m interested in what you wrote here “Without school boards, New Brunswick is the most centralized school system by far in Canada. The School Councils are strictly advisory and ineffectual, as in other provinces. In 2001, DECs were established and they are “volunteers.“ There is little or no accountability in NB at the local level.”

How much effort has gone into building better, and more operational school councils in N.B.? I’m hazarding a guess that the folks at central command have done little in that regard, so the impetus for those more effective school councils needs to begin locally and with very little support that principals and/or teachers can offer because they too are bound (and gagged) by the center.

In restoring local democracy it’s also possible to begin education those on school councils who are community leaders and who have the will and the capability to do so to learn the operational ropes of education delivery.

In Ontario schools councils were rolled out very badly and only the very effective and few smart school leaders saw the value in connecting and opening up a genuine dialogue WITH parents and allowing their school councils to move into a role of some substance.

Remember that many in our current government got into politics by cutting their teeth on school boards or in the classroom - these are the same people who didn’t want parent councils to work and be effective.

I can also say that from my own experience that the government which finally legislated school councils was also wrought with individuals and ministers who didn’t support their own regulations and operations governing school councils. I recall chatting with a Conservative MPP at Queen’s Park who mused about how he felt that legislating school councils was a HUGE mistake.

Training school councils and parents to be those effective locally democratic groups is still possible but it’s going to happen one individual school at a time, one principal with a staff that “gets it”, AND, it’s going to take those folks networking and sharing their success with others.

Posted by Chuck on 08/23 at 09:33 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: