Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Can U spell K-I-N-D-L-E?

March 08, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:43 AM

Picking up on Malkin’s March 2nd post, Pandora’s Box, about computers in the classroom, I suggest that we beware of gifts in smaller packages.  The latest technological classroom fad is the e-reader, which has revolutionized the book industry.  Avid fans (and I should mention I envy them) of e-readers sing their praises.  But the jury is out on their classroom use.

Two articles that caught my attention.  The first reports on an Illinois elementary school that has introduced the Kindle e-reader into the classroom to get students “excited about reading.”  The e-reader also has a read-aloud feature that the school says will help some students learn to sound out words.  The other headline juxtaposes with these words:  OMG! textspeak in schoolwork wink.  The report goes on to say that teachers at Vancouver, WA schools are concerned at the amount of texting lingo that is creeping into serious school assignments.  Here’s an example: “i luv Romeo & Juliet cuz u get to c how in luv the 2 caractrz r :p”  Translation please.

“It’s easy, and we’re lazy,” said 17-year-old Ben Lyons, a senior at Heritage High School. “We like to take the easy route.”

And this doesn’t mean that the easy way is the better way:

While shorthand writing is handy for texting, it just causes problems in the classroom, 17-year-old Derrick Easley said. While he may spend less time writing the assignment, he spends more time editing and correcting the work, he said.

Is all this worth the cost?  (Keep in mind an e-reader costs a few hundred dollars and when handled by hundreds of kids will certainly have to take a lot of abuse!)  Will this translate into improved student achievement?  Or are we creating another problem that will need solving?

So, readers what do you think? 

Comments

To get kids to read it is important that they get books they like. For lots of kids these books are non-fiction with interesting pictures of things like weapons or gross skin conditions, books that can be taken to anywhere and beaten up and shared.

Posted by Rachel Goddyn on 03/08 at 11:35 AM

In one way I am all for it, since e-readers allow fonts to be change, how many words per line, and has been proven to increase fluency. What I do not like is the use of the text-speak, for all readers. Although text-speak is a useful addition for students who have trouble with decoding, it still does not teach the children to learn how to decode. It must be taught, or otherwise there is too much dependence on hearing every unknown word, that will impact on reading fluency, instead of trying to sound out the unknown word on their own. Human nature will take the easy route, as in my youngest when I introduce text-speak apps. Although helpful for my youngest who has low phonemic awareness, text-speak could very well be used by the education system as the default for students who have decoding problems, rather than using the instruction route to remediate the decoding.

Posted by Nancy on 03/09 at 06:29 AM

Further to my last post on the reliance on the use of tech devices and accommodations in the public education, rather than to ensure that all students have the essential skills needed to become effective readers and writers, a headline appeared in my e-mail - “CRA to spend $42,900 to help dyslexic worker learn French ” in the Globe. One federal employee, and he must be highly placed in Revenue Canada, to warranted language retraining, at a school that is own by a woman who developed a method called the Simultaneous Multisensory Teaching method (S.M.T.). http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/cra-to-spend-42900-to-help-dyslexic-worker-learn-french/article1933220/

It is “, based on the Orton system, is a language re-education method developed to meet the needs of students of all ages, who need a more thorough knowledge of the structure of written language, and a solid understanding of the association of sounds and symbols, before learning how to apply the concepts and rules of written language.”
http://www.dyslexiacentre.ca/english/smt_method.htm

The developer has founded schools, plus training programs for individuals and teachers to teach using the SMT methods.In addition to that, ” she conducts in-service trainings throughout School Boards and Universities in Canada as well as the Federal Government.”
http://www.heritage-academy.com/founder.htm
What one does not find in her schools, are a over-reliance on devices that will take short cuts in reading and writing proficiency. So unlike public schools, that are quite willing to sacrifice reading and writing proficiency, in favour of using less costly short-term solutions, passing the bad outcomes to the private sector, to fixed. And in this case, federal tax monies is handed to the private sector, because of the inadequacies of the public education system to remediate language problems and in part the beliefs held by the educrats on language. that are always looking for the cheapest solution, without regard of the long-term costs to the taxpayers and the ills of society.

Posted by Nancy on 03/09 at 08:17 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: