Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Abstinence is Even Safer Sex

February 02, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:18 AM

When my son was in grade 7 or 8, his teacher brought in the apparatus for shooting up and proceeded to demonstrate to the class the correct way to inject heroin. After the lesson, my son asked the teacher why he had taught this lesson. In my opinion, it was a valid question.

Modern safe-sex classes raise some of the same issues, in that they make the assumption that students will be sexually active and therefore might as well do it safely.  A new study from the University of Pennsylvania has found that 12-year-olds who attended abstinence-only classes were less likely to have had sex over the next two years. 

Comments

Good luck with that.

Posted by Doug Little on 02/02 at 10:30 AM

Imagine that, another example of old fashioned advice that “modern” science has proved effective. At some point, preaching or teaching abstinence was thought ineffective by some guru educators. Like many of these gurus they probably made up their minds about effectiveness without actually testing the idea.

So….if teaching kids about consequences works for sexual activity, I wonder what would happen to student grades if we warned kids about the consequences of poor performance and then actually had some consequences. Fear is a great motivator.

Posted by Lou D'Amore on 02/02 at 07:09 PM

Lou you are still alive. Still peddling that scare the @%&$ out of them stuff.

Abstinence won’t work with the children of the people on this site let alone any others. Go ahead live in your bubble.

Posted by Doug Little on 02/02 at 07:25 PM

Hey Mr. Education Guru - “abstinence won’t work with the children of the people on this site…..”

You don’t speak for me.

Posted by Chuck on 02/02 at 09:12 PM

I taught in a classroom for 30 years. I wish I had a nickel for every uptight conservative parent who discovered their 16 year old was doing it. As I said I wish you all the best with that abstinence point of view. Naive but kind of retro.

Posted by Doug Little on 02/02 at 11:00 PM

You still don’t speak for me Doug. You’re one voice that stands as a great example as to why school boards are hopping on the alternative school band wagon.

It’s because they know what we know….that they’re competing for fewer students and by offering choice within the system they may stem the bleeding of students looking outside the system.

I wish I had a nickel every time a champion of the public school system tried to trivialize parents or try to shut down debate with nonsensical last words I’d be much richer than the education guru here.

Posted by Chuck on 02/03 at 07:34 AM

I have supported public alternative schools for 30 years. Established two of them in High Park when I was a trustee. Nothing wrong with public alternatives although I did not put my daughter in one. I was not satisfied with the fuzzyness of some of them.

There is a huge difference between a public alternative under a school board subject to a collective agreement, staffing rules and board policy democratically arrived at and a private school that gets a voucher or any level of public support without accountability.

Posted by Doug Little on 02/03 at 11:39 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: