Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Comparing apples to oranges

January 24, 2012 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 06:38 AM

Nearing the end of my Florida tour, I bring you this report from Ocala. The governor has just released a report ranking the state’s 67 school districts on the basis of their performance on the state tests. In Ocala, which ranked 44th, the usual suspects are criticizing the rankings - saying it’s not fair to compare districts with different socioeconomic makeups and adding that the unfair comparison is disheartening to those with low rankings.

This may come as a surprise to some, but this time I agree with the usual suspects. Of course, this doesn’t mean that I would totally junk the rankings - just make them fair. The basis of comparison should be the value added by school districts - for example, Tennessee’s Value-Added Assessment model

Page 1 of 1 pages